Wednesday, 2 February 2011

February 2nd - Path of Daggers doing my head in!

I don't know what it is about this book, but I am finding The Path of Daggers, by Robert Jordan really hard going. This is odd as, until now, I've been enjoying the Wheel of Time Series. This is book 8, and I'm over 200 pages in and it still feels like NOTHING HAS HAPPENED! Come on everyone, get a grip and DO SOMETHING ... ANYTHING! You've got people with magical powers, half-men half-wolves, baddies who are REAL baddies and an evil that could quite easily bring the world to an end ... surely you could get a bit of action going instead of all this swanning about, inwardly bemoaning your situation, pining over loved ones ... ENOUGH ALREADY! I wouldn't mind all of this if it was building tension to what you know will be a big clash of good and evil - but it's not - I'm about as tense as a limp dishcloth, which as been soaked for 24 hours in clothes softener. Oh, and buy the way, the central character around which all the action (when there is any) revolves STILL hasn't made an appearance. Maybe it's because I've recently read the whole of the Mallorean books by David Eddings that I feel a bit disappointed by the Path of Daggers. Mr Eddings books have all the same themes (well, most fantasy books do), but are jam-packed with action. Maybe this book was a bit of a struggle for the author too. I will persevere in the hope that things will perk up.

I'm also in the middle of A Solitary Man, by Stephen Leather - which is fairly bowling along after a bit of a confusing start where a whole host of different characters are introduced in very short order, which was a tad confusing. But I'm right there now. Am reading this in audio, and enjoying this thriller about the drug trade - with much of the action taking place in Thailand. This is racing along, in stark contrast to Path of Daggers.

2 comments:

  1. So, in theory, does there come a point when a book is soooo bad/dull/pointless that you give up, for the purposes of this experiment (if that's the right word)? It used to be that I would NEVER give up, but as I've got older, find that for a few books, life is just too darn short. I won't name names.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think you should name names - it could save us from a very bad mistake! I have never given up on a book yet, and I hope to keep that record going, but hey, you are probably right - maybe the timetable I'm on will change my way of thinking. Another reason for keeping going is that this is part of a series I've already invested many, many hours to and I rally do want to find out what happens to the characters. I will persist for the time being.

    ReplyDelete